Financial services
Fraud, disputes & claims
Establish required facts, calculate payment-level outcomes, and route cases for review.
ENTERPRISE USE CASES
Start with the work you don’t yet trust AI to handle. Claims, refunds, eligibility, approvals. Work where the agent must follow your policies, stay within defined limits, and show why it acted.
Financial services
Establish required facts, calculate payment-level outcomes, and route cases for review.
Retail & ecommerce
Check purchase history, policy windows, stock, and required approvals as the customer’s request changes.
Travel & insurance
Apply eligibility and coverage rules as circumstances change.
Enterprise software
Verify supplied figures against source records and policy. Surface discrepancies and calculate permitted adjustments.
HR & benefits
Apply the relevant policy and route decisions to the authorized person.
Operations
Reconcile documents, amounts, and required approvals before acting.
Illustrative application areas. Available actions and autonomy depend on each deployment’s declared scope and integrations.
FIT YOUR EXISTING OPERATION
Use the same Apollo-1 runtime in either role, alongside your people, applications, and other agents.
01 / END-TO-END AGENT
Handle the conversation, establish facts, and complete permitted actions. Ask for approval or hand off when the declared policy requires it.
02 / EMBEDDED CAPABILITY
Use Apollo-1 for a specific task or decision inside a larger process, such as checking eligibility or calculating an adjustment.
FIND YOUR FIRST USE CASE
Different payments, items, or people within one case need different treatment.
A request reaches the edge of the written policy and needs an explicit handoff or approval.
Amounts, allocations, credits, and reimbursements need to trace back to their inputs.
DEFINE THE AUTONOMY BOUNDARY
Define what the agent can handle, when it needs approval, and how you’ll measure success.
What should the agent resolve? What remains with a person?
Which policies, limits, permissions, and approvals apply?
Where can the agent establish each required fact?
Which ordinary cases and difficult exceptions must pass?
COMMON QUESTIONS
Three signals: outcomes that differ case by case, requests that reach the edge of written policy and need an approval, and money that has to reconcile back to its inputs. A task with all three is doing work a scripted flow cannot cover and a prompt cannot be trusted with.
Either. It can own a task end to end, handling the conversation, establishing facts and completing permitted actions. Or it can sit inside a larger process and handle one step, such as checking eligibility or calculating an adjustment, and hand back.
The action is not permitted, and the declared behavior decides what follows: ask for the missing approval, explain the constraint, or hand off to a person. The trace records which condition failed and why, so the outcome can be checked rather than guessed at.
Define four things: the outcome the agent should resolve and what stays with a person, the policies and permissions that apply, where each required fact can be established, and the ordinary cases and difficult exceptions that must pass before it goes live.
THE TERM ITSELF
THE COMPARISON
PUT APOLLO-1 TO WORK